Co-Host City: Difference between revisions

From The Colonel's Website
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 40: Line 40:
|{{M25}}
|{{M25}}
|2
|2
|Belgium's answer to a more feasible {{Reykjavik}}
|{{Belgium}}'s answer to a more feasible {{Reykjavik}}
|-
|-
|{{M34}}
|{{M34}}

Latest revision as of 20:28, 7 February 2024

Sometimes, events in the fast-moving world of events make a Mission to the elected Host City difficult or impossible to accomplish.

In these cases, the Colonel and its Regiment may nominate a Co-Host City to serve as the venue for the Mission. The Co-Host City is chosen after discussion from the destinations in the draw, with priority given to those which finished highest, but taking into account the practicalities of organizing a Mission to each destination.

Co-Host Cities

Mission Position in the draw Description
Mission 3 3 Stockholm 2 Sweden's answer to a wetter 2 Alghero
Mission 5 5 Genoa 3 32 Italy's answer to a more accessible 5 Toulouse
Mission 17 17 36 Porto 2 Portugal's answer to a less smelly 17 Palermo
Mission 19 19 Valletta 2 Malta's answer to a safer 19 Miami
Mission 21 21 Budapest 2 Hungary's answer to a cheaper 21 26 Garmisch-Partenkirchen
Mission 22 22 Lisbon 3 Portugal's answer to a more interesting 22 Gibraltar
Mission 23 23 Copenhagen 2 Denmark's answer to a not snowed in 23 Steamboat Springs
Mission 25 25 Ghent 2 Belgium's answer to a more feasible 13 25 Reykjavík
Mission 34 34 Skipton n/a Yorkshire's answer to a COVID-friendly 34 37 Sarajevo
Mission 35 35 Kendal n/a Cumbria's answer to a COVID-friendly 35 Alice Springs
Mission 36 36 Rye n/a Sussex's answer to a COVID-friendly 17 36 Porto